What is srs reddit

I loved Voat in its very very early days, before the migrations from Reddit. But God Damn did that kill Voat overnight, reddit killing the shithead subs. I respected Voat's non-censorship policy, but if I ever end up setting up my own public message board you bet your ass I'm going to have tight rules and clear enforcement. Lesson learned. Absolute freedom of speech does not, should not, and cannot exist in a functional society. This always has been the case, even in America, the free speech capital of the world, you can't just go around saying whatever you want, whenever you want.

If you go stand outside the whitehouse and scream that you're gonna shoot the president, your first amendment right won't protect you for long, nor should it. We can argue about where exactly that line should be drawn, but to argue that it must be either one extreme or the other is stupid. Censoring certain speech does not necessarily lead to complete censured speech.

A lot of people don't understand this, and they don't understand even further that the first amendment does absolutely nothing for your rights in a private organization. Censoring certain speech is a necessary and good thing. Censoring other types of speech is a horrible and chilling thing.

It just depends on what is being censored. Absolute freedom of speech does, should and can exist in a functional society. I can say whatever I want, wherever I want to whoever I want. However if it is smart is another thing. The first amendment does not protect someone from beeing an idiot. Your example with screaming to kill the president is the best example because it is not an opinion but a threat and is not covered under free speech.

I'm allowed to make those threats but I also have to live with the consequenes. We cannot argue about the line because the issue is where do we draw the line and who does decide it? I china for example open criticism of the government is not allowed and will be censored while the america does allow the criticism of anyone.

So a government should not draw the line. What about society? Take a look a russia and you see a land which does not like LGBT-people, so much that the Putin decided it would make some good propaganda to discriminate them by law. So where do we draw the line? And who should decide it? Is it so extreme to let people say whatever the fuck they want but it is also their responsibility to shoulder the consequences of what they say?

We kinda have to let go people spewing bullshit because otherwise there is a chance that the rules could be bend to censor speech that has every right to be free. It is similar to the idea behind innocent until proven guilty. Even if we have to let go the murderer of a child free because there is no evidence but on the other side many other innocent people are free because there was no evidence in the first place.

It is hard to accept this idea but it protects many, many people, even me and you. As long as you don't commit any crime chances are high that we both will never see a prison from the inside. I used to be extremely pro freedom of speech myself, then I figured out that it's all fine as long as we only ban the right kinds of speech.

But it's ok to have some tolerance just to make sure you're not accidentally banning those being reasonable or to prevent the censorship escalating into actual totalitarianism. Sure, I absolutely think we should err towards open speech. But there are plenty of blantent cases that shouldn't exist.

It feels like they're just all there right now. Their users don't leave the subreddit much. When they do leave the subreddit, they are largely rejected. The general community has no tolerance for vaguely topical hate anymore, which suggests the reddit community today is very different from the reddit that spawned FPH.

The deletion of those subs and large-scale exodus of their core users successfully led to the rise of a new set of norms. They still to this day blindly upvote every post on their sub via bot or otherwise yet the admins will give you a ban for downvoting their stuff too much. The fact that Reddit went on a hate rant against Ellen and then found out it was to the wrong person AND still didn't renege was the beginning of Reddit's takeover by the anti SJW brigades.

And with the addition of "GET. While I normally am in favor of full free speech and leaving communities to themselves, I honestly think banning FPH was an overall positive move for Reddit. It was at the point where it was leaking into many different communities, appearing in posts that really had nothing to do with the subject. And the posts you see on Reddit influence your thinking.

Back when it was a default I was so mad at religious people. It honestly made me toxic. What's strange to me is that obviously a lot of people who participated in the toxicity of FPH are still around on reddit, but they don't make comments like that anymore. It's almost as if, absent that concentrated idea , the toxicity related goes away as well.

It's almost as if, absent that concentrated idea, the toxicity related goes away as well. Nearly everyone has some sympathy -- and perhaps even empathy if they were overweight themselves in the past -- for fat people.

We know it's possible for us to get fat through simple lack of attention to our diet and exercise or through an accident which cause us to gain weight through forced inactivity or medications with the side-effect of altered metabolism and we therefore know that at least some people are fat for reasons which they cannot be blamed. Everyone also knows that abusing people for being fat will almost certainly only increase the variables which lead them to eat and therefore the "we're doing it to make them healthy" line is bs.

This said there must be conditions in place to cause large amounts of people to spew hatred considering there are strong limits against doing so even in the absence of compassion, which is sadly a human trait not emphasises in modern culture. This quick sociopsychological model of nasty shitposting explains why carefully banning places which exist to invent those spurious reasons and create a climate of conformity reduce the behaviour.

It was certainly individuals who shitposted about hating fat people but it wasn't those individuals who drove themselves to do it. This is my Buddhism coming through now, and not my paltry degree-level Psychological 'training', but I reckon the most individual act is to love quietly for reasons you do not need to share, and the most communal act is to hate loudly because it's the easiest way for you to fit in as you are scared of the crowd turning on you for your own failings.

I'm totally unconvinced of this. Maybe temporarily you might see a flood of users bleeding into other communities, but there's zero evidence to suggest that 'containment' boards are a thing. If containment board logic were valid, FPH users would still be spewing their nonsense all over the site at the same rate as they were the day they were banned. But now, either those users have packed up for Voat or shut up.

Equally desirable outcomes. Everyone shits, doesn't mean we all need to see yours smeared publicly on the streets on the way to work. Same with a shitty opinion. The only special snowflakes are the people that think anyone on earth cares about everything that crosses their mind. We really, really don't. I think rude things all the time but I don't say them because I am an adult with manners.

That is the kind of website I would like to be on. Conspiracists are gonna love point 2a. SRS still not getting shut down after doxxing admins and actually harassing them irl. Casual reddit user here. I never actually looked into the whole messy business that was Ms. Pao's tenure as CEO. My understanding was quite simply that she fired somebody and was thus branded as the reddit Anti-Christ. In This Section. News and Updates. Share Tweet Follow us on Twitter. Latest News UK risk level for disease incursion in wild birds has increased from medium to high Firework displays need responsible planning Covid pass - what you need to know Predatory fraudster stole women's life savings in elaborate pest-control scam Inbound telephone problems.

Frameworks and programming languages have subs devoted to them. In general many, many interests have their own subreddits. That's where you can often have intelligent discussions with mostly sensible people.

HN isn't perfect on the first point especially political discussions get repeated over and over as well , but still better. That is something traditional forums often do a lot better, since a hot topic stays active for a long time instead of falling off and being replaced with a new one that discusses all the same points over again. Especially for common questions or product discussions, traditional boards tend to point people to search and existing topics instead of repeating them.

A lot of Reddit users don't know what SRS is either. That's part of what makes it great, it's pretty easy to completely avoid the shitty parts. The problem with SRS wasn't that there were idiots off in their own private subreddit, it was that they took their opinions and vote-brigaded them across the rest of the site.

You don't have to go to the shitty parts, the shitty parts come to you. Not if you unsub from the defaults, which are garbage. But outside of the garbage subs, people don't. It's impossible to know what will trigger one of them to come invading, but when one does they all do. If KiA decides they don't like something, Ghazi will inevitably follow to counter them, then SRD will link it up and send their users charging in, SRS will start cherry-picking the worst of the invaders screaming at each other and then Oh, and there's no good as in, works consistently tool I'm aware of to mass-nuke entire threads of comments as a moderator, so I've had plenty of exercises in deleting a couple hundred posts one by one.

I thank you for your nightmarish work by the way, what's your sub? It sounds like you do a good job! But yeah, they're all awful. All of them have gotten far beyond the point where they stand for something, if they ever did: their only purpose now is to perpetuate their own existence. VLM on Oct 24, root parent next [—]. If there were an easy way to identify that kind of content and wield a banhammer against it, it would really clean up the internet in general and stinkier corners of reddit in particular.

Unfortunately, NLP is a hard problem, and detecting intent is even harder: so hard even humans have trouble with it. I have only found a subreddit about the car brand KIA? Semaphor on Oct 24, root parent next [—]. Thank you. And the titles does not seem too bad, but I haven't read the comments.

Edit: Well, it's not too bad. What they're not telling you is that it's the GamerGate sub-reddit. In fact they are quite open about it. Yes, well, I think if we've learned anything, over the last 2 years of this issue, it's that it is a supremely polarizing and subjective topic. It's better than it used to be in some ways: much of the worst have moved on to other forums. I don't disagree but there are lots of sub reddits without drama and toxicity.

Opendata, datasets, babyelephantgifs etc etc. If you choose to ignore subs that have anything to do with politics, religion etc, Reddit can be quite enjoyable.

That's also true of 4chan. No thanks, take me back to the meme zone! Like us on Facebook! Add a Comment. You must login or signup first!

Already a memeber? Login Now! Don't have an account? Sign up Now!